Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Syllabus Repository Update: Writing with Data
    • Erica Stone: Designing a Life Through Writing, Work, and Intentionality
    • [Updated Deadline: July 15th] 2025-26 DRC Graduate Fellowship Application
    • C&W 2025 Session Review: “Whose Time is It, Anyway?” (Keynote)
    • 2025 C&W Session Review: From Chatbot to Classroom: Understanding Student and Instructor Use and Perceptions of AI (Session C)
    • 2025 C&W Session Review: “Invention, AI, and Circulation” (Session F)
    • 2025 C&W Session Review: “Moving through Space” (Session H)
    • Blog Carnival 23: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2025 C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
      • DRC Fellows Application
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    ENGL 303: Writing with Data (Scientific & Technical Writing)

    0
    By Syllabus Repository Editors on July 11, 2025

    Course Title: Writing with Data (Scientific & Technical Writing)

    Author: Marie Pruitt, University of Louisville

    Full SyllabusDownload

    Date Published: 2025

    Course Level: Upper-Level Undergraduate

    Course Description: We are persuaded by and persuade with data every day. Today, we live in what’s known as the Zettabyte era, a period of human and technological history characterized by our collective wealth of information. In 2016, global internet traffic surpassed one zettabyte (the equivalent of about 1 trillion gigabytes);1 In 2023, we produced 120 zettabytes of data globally.2 Unfortunately, we also live in a post-truth era, characterized by our wealth of mis- and dis-information. Truth cannot be found withing data itself; truth is instead discovered by collecting, investigating, interpreting, interrogating, representing, and contextualizing data. As Hans Rosling writes, “The world cannot be understood without numbers. And it cannot be understood with numbers alone” (p. 128).3

    In this class, we will learn how to compose effective arguments using the data that makes up our world. By examining how data is created and collected, how it’s interpreted and sometimes misrepresented, and how writers wield the power of data to craft effective writing, we will explore the ways data can be used to influence individuals, groups, institutions, and even entire populations. We will also further interrogate the concept of data in general, exploring the material effects that the creation and existence of data has on people and the planet. Throughout the class, we’ll look at scholarly articles, popular press articles, books, videos, images, podcasts, and more to develop a deeper understanding of the reciprocal relationship between writing and data in a variety of contexts.

    Learning Outcomes:

    Rhetorical Knowledge: Students will produce writing that responds appropriately to a variety of rhetorical situations. Their writing should:

    • Demonstrate knowledge of audience, which includes the ability to determine appropriate scope, genre, technical vocabulary and detail, and tone when writing for both technical and non-technical audiences
    • Demonstrate knowledge of context, which includes analyzing professional cultures, social contexts, and audiences to determine how they shape the various purposes and forms of writing
    • Demonstrate an ability to use, explain and integrate quantitative information with verbal prose to achieve particular rhetorical purposes
    • Demonstrate knowledge of research methods that produce professional documents, including analyzing professional contexts and assessing and summarizing information resources

    Processes: Students will produce writing reflective of a multi-stage composing and revising process. Their writing should:

    • Demonstrate knowledge of the writing process, which means engaging various strategies for planning, researching, drafting, revising, and editing documents that respond effectively and ethically to scientific and technical situations and audiences
    • Demonstrate knowledge of collaborative strategies, such as writing in a team setting, working and communicating on-line, setting and achieving project goals, and responding constructively to peers’ work

    Conventions: Students will produce writing that strategically employs appropriate conventions in different writing situations. Their writing should:

    • Demonstrate knowledge of document design, including the implementation of various principles of format, layout, and design of professional visual/verbal documents that meet multiple needs and integrate a variety of written, visual, and oral elements of design
    • Demonstrate control of the editing process, including the production of documents which exhibit concise language, appropriate technical vocabulary, appropriate format, proper sentence structure, and standardized grammar

    Teaching Philosophy: In the classes I teach, I follow a “networked pedagogy” that encourages students to identify, trace, and sometimes disrupt the networks that contribute to their writing processes. This approach encourages students to engage with these systems, such as the social networks that inform their revision processes, the environmental networks that facilitate their access to information, and the digital networks that shape the afterlife of their writing. By implementing these ideas into my classroom activities, assignments, and assessment practices, my goal is to help students learn to use writing as a tool for understanding, navigating, and shaping the world around them. 

    Author

    • Syllabus Repository Editors
      Syllabus Repository Editors

      View all posts
    Syllabus Repository
    • Artificial Intelligence (6)
    • Research Methods (1)
    • Writing with Data (8)
    • Digital rhetoric (9)
    • Anti-racist pedagogy (3)
    • Feminist rhetoric (1)
    • Technical communication (5)
    • Composition studies (6)
    • First-year writing (8)
    • Gaming (1)
    • Writing for social media (2)
    • User experience (2)
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.