Defending the Digital There is a noticeable dystopic strand in digital rhetoric scholarship – a sense that we have a responsibility to extend rhetorical analysis into the digital because we need to find out what’s really happening, to discover how our world is being undermined or overtaken. This is even more pronounced in popular media, where headlines such as “Don’t Believe the Algorithm” and “If an Algorithm Wrote This, How Would You Even Know?” stoke popular fears about robot overlords emerging from parthenogenetic, mysteriously mathematical creation cycles. Rhetorical scholarship rarely becomes so fearmongering, but it also tends to take on…
Recent Posts
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: EA.5 Navigating Algorithmic Literacy Practices among Digital Feminists and Activists in the Global South
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: CA.3 Developing AI Literacy in Composition Courses
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: D.6 Food Studies in Rhetoric and Writing: Taking Stock of Our Next Steps
- Starting with Voice: How Language Awareness Shapes Multimodal Composing
- From Studio Remixing to Classroom Remixing: How Research Posters Can Teach Semiotic Border-Crossing for Social Justice
- Multimodal, Multilingual Praxis in the First Year Composition Classroom: Reflections on Promoting Social and Linguistic Justice Via Rhetorical Translation
- Against Linguistic Flattening: Translingual Multimodality in the Age of AI
- When the Teacher Stops Talking: A Human-Centered Experiment with Classroom Silence