In 2011, I was very excited to read Bruce Horner, Min-Zhan Lu, Jacqueline Jones Royster, and John Trimbur’s article on translingualism. A translingual approach recognizes that all language users can achieve their goals through a variety of linguistic means. This framework undermines monolingualist expectations and it values all potential discursive resources (305). Our students can build on their knowledge and language practices. They can mix, play with, and create powerful forms of connecting with others in local and global contexts. While the article emphasizes the role of linguistic resources, a translingual approach should not isolate language from all other forms…
Recent Posts
- C&W 2025 Session Review: “Whose Time is It, Anyway?” (Keynote)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: From Chatbot to Classroom: Understanding Student and Instructor Use and Perceptions of AI (Session C)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: “Invention, AI, and Circulation” (Session F)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: “Moving through Space” (Session H)
- Blog Carnival 23: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
- Collage as Socialist Circulation
- Play, Rhetoric, and the Circulation of J.D. Vance Photoshops
- Attending to Scales of Intensity: A Viral/Chronological Method for Researching the Circulation of Activist Rhetoric