In 2011, I was very excited to read Bruce Horner, Min-Zhan Lu, Jacqueline Jones Royster, and John Trimbur’s article on translingualism. A translingual approach recognizes that all language users can achieve their goals through a variety of linguistic means. This framework undermines monolingualist expectations and it values all potential discursive resources (305). Our students can build on their knowledge and language practices. They can mix, play with, and create powerful forms of connecting with others in local and global contexts. While the article emphasizes the role of linguistic resources, a translingual approach should not isolate language from all other forms…
Recent Posts
- Flock vs. DeFlock: The Constitutive Limits of Community
- “I Am a Living UNESCO Site”: When AI Flattens Culture with Dr. Cana Itchuaqiyaq
- A Battle of Narratives: Community Resistance to the Material Costs of AI with Dr. Dustin Edwards
- Collaborative Podcasting for Social Justice in Composition Classrooms
- 2026 C&W Session Review: Session G: Sustaining Programmatic Assessment: The Role of Digital Praxis and Reflection
- The Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative Interviews the editors of Computers and Composition
- [Utopia]-in-the-loop in an Emergent Age of Full Automation
- Ghosts-in-the-Loop: Bormann’s Ghost v. AI