by Mark W. Shealy Academic publishing is quickly evolving beyond traditional double-blind peer review conventions toward more open-review and open-access publishing sensitive to institutional changes in higher education (Abeles, 2012). New forms of peer review and mass authorship form part of a changing publishing environment (Laquintano, 2010) and encourage new technological forms such as Networked Participatory Scholarship (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012). This current producing of texts through nonhierarchical means presages radically different definitions of academic books and articles (Perakakis, 2013). Hands-on practice such as academic search engine optimization (ASEO) to prepare scholarly articles for academic search engines and Google Scholar is…
Recent Posts
- Toward a Post-Temporal Time-Consciousness in GenAI-Mediated Writing
- Flock vs. DeFlock: The Constitutive Limits of Community
- “I Am a Living UNESCO Site”: When AI Flattens Culture with Dr. Cana Itchuaqiyaq
- A Battle of Narratives: Community Resistance to the Material Costs of AI with Dr. Dustin Edwards
- Collaborative Podcasting for Social Justice in Composition Classrooms
- 2026 C&W Session Review: Session G: Sustaining Programmatic Assessment: The Role of Digital Praxis and Reflection
- The Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative Interviews the editors of Computers and Composition
- [Utopia]-in-the-loop in an Emergent Age of Full Automation