by Mark W. Shealy Academic publishing is quickly evolving beyond traditional double-blind peer review conventions toward more open-review and open-access publishing sensitive to institutional changes in higher education (Abeles, 2012). New forms of peer review and mass authorship form part of a changing publishing environment (Laquintano, 2010) and encourage new technological forms such as Networked Participatory Scholarship (Veletsianos & Kimmons, 2012). This current producing of texts through nonhierarchical means presages radically different definitions of academic books and articles (Perakakis, 2013). Hands-on practice such as academic search engine optimization (ASEO) to prepare scholarly articles for academic search engines and Google Scholar is…
Recent Posts
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: EA.5 Navigating Algorithmic Literacy Practices among Digital Feminists and Activists in the Global South
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: CA.3 Developing AI Literacy in Composition Courses
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: D.6 Food Studies in Rhetoric and Writing: Taking Stock of Our Next Steps
- Starting with Voice: How Language Awareness Shapes Multimodal Composing
- From Studio Remixing to Classroom Remixing: How Research Posters Can Teach Semiotic Border-Crossing for Social Justice
- Multimodal, Multilingual Praxis in the First Year Composition Classroom: Reflections on Promoting Social and Linguistic Justice Via Rhetorical Translation
- Against Linguistic Flattening: Translingual Multimodality in the Age of AI
- When the Teacher Stops Talking: A Human-Centered Experiment with Classroom Silence