Linguistic Version What happens when from inception our compositions honor reader diversity specifically in terms of abilities? What happens when we reject the notion of transliteration, fashioning translation as foundational to our invention and delivery processes? What happens when we craft “text experiences,” not just “texts,” experiences that invite readers to determine ultimate meanings? What happens when we release some control of the message itself in favor of greater accessibility (a truly “participatory design”?)? Sean Zdenek, in User Experience, describes the often “noisy” experience of multimodal, multi media texts. He writes that “…sounds accumulate, overlap, and compete with one another:…
Recent Posts
- [Updated Deadline: July 15th] 2025-26 DRC Graduate Fellowship Application
- C&W 2025 Session Review: “Whose Time is It, Anyway?” (Keynote)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: From Chatbot to Classroom: Understanding Student and Instructor Use and Perceptions of AI (Session C)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: “Invention, AI, and Circulation” (Session F)
- 2025 C&W Session Review: “Moving through Space” (Session H)
- Blog Carnival 23: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
- Collage as Socialist Circulation
- Play, Rhetoric, and the Circulation of J.D. Vance Photoshops