Linguistic Version What happens when from inception our compositions honor reader diversity specifically in terms of abilities? What happens when we reject the notion of transliteration, fashioning translation as foundational to our invention and delivery processes? What happens when we craft “text experiences,” not just “texts,” experiences that invite readers to determine ultimate meanings? What happens when we release some control of the message itself in favor of greater accessibility (a truly “participatory design”?)? Sean Zdenek, in User Experience, describes the often “noisy” experience of multimodal, multi media texts. He writes that “…sounds accumulate, overlap, and compete with one another:…
Recent Posts
- Expertise-in-the-loop: Genre Judgment, Context, and AI in Writing
- Liminality-in-the-Loop Writing: Relational Meaning-Making in Human–Machine Composing
- Intro to Blog Carnival 25: [Blank]-in-the-loop writing
- Call for Session Reviews: Computers and Writing Conference 2026
- Social Justice Pedagogies
- Blog Carnival 24: Editor’s Outro: Multimodality, Social Justice, and Human-Centered Praxis
- From Digital Content to Academic Confidence: My Rhetorical Journey
- Scooby Doo, Who Are You?: Scaffolding Collaboration Through Narrative Tropes