Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    Doorknob Hanger: A Case Study in Making Rhetoric: Part 2 of “A Maker Mentality Toward Writing”

    0
    By David Sheridan on March 28, 2016 Blog Carnival 8

     

    sketch1
    Design for a doorknob hanger.As I worked on my contribution to the Makerspace Blog Carnival I wanted to make something informed by the rhetorical principles I was exploring.  I decided to make a doorknob hanger using the Language and Media Center’s digital cutter.

    The digital cutter is like a printer.  But instead of rendering a digital design with ink on the surface of paper, the cutter uses a small blade to cut the digital design.  I wanted a little bit of intricacy to show what the cutter can do.

    Working on my design in Illustrator, I used a few tricks that students have taught me over the years.  For instance, you can create interesting shapes by copying a simple shape over and over, rotating it a little each time.  Illustrator automates this process.

    Illustrator’s Shape Builder Tool is useful for creating designs that are meant to be cut.  This tool allows you to combine overlapping shapes into a single shape.IMG_2187  Without this step, all of the different parts of my design would have remained separate.  When I cut the design, I would have been left with a bunch of fragments instead of a whole shape.

    After finalizing my design, I cut the door hanger out of an old file folder, attracted to the bright yellow color and the thicker material.

    Interestingly, the my doorknob hanger doesn’t work.  The arrows that connect the shapes in my flow-chart-style design are too narrow and do not provide enough structural rigidity.  To photograph the finished product hanging from a door, I had to tape it in place; otherwise, it would distort under its own weight.  This highlights the reality that a maker mentality toward writing needs to address new considerations.  When I submit a manuscript for publication, for instance, I do not worry that the pages will distort under their own weight.  But when a composition is meant to interact with its physical environment in precise ways — as is the case with a doorknob hanger — considerations such as weight, structural rigidity, and balance, tend to assert themselves.

    hanger
    The finished doorknob hanger, taped in place so that it doesn’t distort under its own weight.

    One thing you might notice about the finished product is that the printed words are very precisely positioned in relation to the cuts. That’s because we print registration marks — black lines that mark the corners of a rectangle that surrounds the design — along with the design itself.  The cutter reads the marks with a laser and then makes the cuts relative to those marks.  This makes it easy to combine printed and cut aspects of the design in precise ways.

     

    VIDEO: THE CUTTER IN OPERATION

     

    VIDEO: RE-ENACTMENT OF DESIGNING DOORKNOB HANGER IN ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR.

    Author

    • David Sheridan
      David Sheridan

      David M. Sheridan is an Associate Professor in Michigan State University's Residential College in the Arts and Humanities, where he directs the Language and Media Center.

      View all posts
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    By Alyse CampbellMay 6, 20250

    Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 

    By Thais Rodrigues Cons, Toluwani OdedeyiApril 25, 20250

    Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia

    By Toluwani Odedeyi, Thais Rodrigues ConsMarch 31, 20250

    Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery

    By Mehdi MohammadiFebruary 11, 20250

    Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    By Marie Pruitt, Robert Beck, Alex MashnyFebruary 4, 20250

    Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.