Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    Watson Session D11: Games, Play, and Design: Composing Mobility in Genres, Learning, and Knowledge

    0
    By Kristin Ravel on November 10, 2016 2016 Watson Reviews

    Presenters
    Brett Keegan, Syracuse University
    Nina Feng, University of Utah
    Roger Graves, University of Alberta
    Heather Graves, University of Alberta
    Geoffrey Rockwell, University of Alberta

    Review
    In the panel “Games, Play, and Design,” each of the presenters approached game integration into the composition classroom from different institutional contexts and theoretical perspectives. Yet, what tied these presentations together was the thoughtful level of research and discussion that explored how we, as instructors, may move beyond approaching games in the classroom as a single activity or even a more casual theme, toward creating games that encompass the goals of a particular course and the writing that takes place there.  

    Brett Keegan’s talk “Tinkering with (Inter)textuality” connected understandings of rhetoric to play by pulling from game theory, rhetorical discussion on design and invention, and scholarship on genre. Keegan describes how genre and games are aligned since they both require a procedural rhetoric—or some set of implicit rules—that develop and change through circulation.

    Quote from Eilola's "Living on the Surface" on play: "C: Yeah. But this is...this is just the first level. They're all Different. J: Wow...So how do you figure out what the rules are? C: Just play J: Just play? And then what happens? C: You just...play."
    [from conference slides]
    To show how these considerations of convention may be brought into the composition classroom, Keegan shared an assignment that asks students to select a writing genre and compose a text that resists, plays with, and/or attempts to break the conventions of that genre. Given the flexibility and play this activity embraces, students are provided the opportunity to demystify genre conventions and develop an increased awareness of the rules that circulate as we compose.

    In the next presentation “Deep Gamification World Making in First-Year Writing,” Nina Feng described how she turned her first-year writing course into a game world as a response to Gee and Giroux’s critiques of standardized education. During the talk, Feng acknowledges some of the tension and debate around the term “gamification,” stating, “I hate this term…but it is useful.” Gamification, for Feng, is more about games than it is play, since it emphasizes the use of game design elements in non-game contexts. On the other hand, games that include the integration of play allow for freedom and for the “players” to make choices.

    Whereas much past game design for education has been problematic and shallow since it has focused on features of a game—such as points, leaderboards, and badges—there have been less strives to make pedagogical environments that employ the deep features of a game that embrace play, wonder, and narrative possibilities.

    In her own pedagogy, Feng took advantage of the affordances of games’ deep features by developing her first-year writing class as a sci-fi game space called “The Empathy Trials.” The features of “The Empathy Trials” are complex and go far beyond the simple integration of badge or point systems: for example, Feng performs as the planet’s leader by creating pre-recorded video narratives and even leaves clues under students’ desks to add to the narrative of the game experience.

    Image of a broken building with shattered windows
    [Image representing “The Empathy Trials” from conference slides]
    Most importantly, the game world Feng creates resists the shallow features of gamification to more fully immerse students into a world of play and knowledge-building.

    In the final presentation Roger Graves and Heather Graves described The Game of Writing, a software program developed specifically for the composition classroom at the University of Alberta. The Game of Writing automates gamification systems often used in classrooms, such as goal achievement, recognition through badges, and statistical feedback. The software also uses social networking theory to encourage commenting and feedback to students from other students, from the instructor, from writing tutors, and from graduate teaching assistants.

    [Minutes 47-52 of this video from CCCC 2015 in Tampa, Florida offers another glimpse of “The Game of Writing”]

    As opposed to a course learning management system or a competitive game, “The Game of Writing” is a composing system, where the primary goal is collaborating and emphasizing a writing feedback cycle.

    Interface for The Game of Writing
    [Interface for The Game of Writing from Conference Slides]
    The software was designed as one solution to the budgetary constraints of a university that wanted students to receive writing education but lacked the funding to support small-scale, discussion-based composition courses. Whereas a large number of students in a single writing classroom is likely to have negative repercussions on students’ outcomes and success in the class, The Game of Writing courses allow up to two-hundred students per instructor, and the course, based on the integration of social media and gamification design, actually benefits from having a larger number of students per class.

    Collectively, these three presentations on games, play, and design speak to the degree that games and gaming conventions are transforming not only how we teach, but also what we value when we teach writing. They also speak to very different versions of what a composition future that more fully embraces games and gamification may look like.

    [View the story “#WatsCon16 #D11” on Storify]

    (As of 2/2/2018 the Storify has been archived below.)

    Archived Storify post:

    Feng points out that in designing course that takes up "deep gamification," we must make space for student choice, play #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    @b_keegan uses Lynda Barry's Syllabus as examples of playing w/ genre https://t.co/Q42i81qUvu #WatsCon16 #D11

    — Kristin (@kristin_ravel) October 21, 2016

    @rogergraves and Heather Graves note value of social-media style interface for hybrid online course #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    Heather Graves and @rogergraves invite us to consider the ways that gamification allows composition to scale up #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    https://twitter.com/b_keegan/status/789490357427929088

    Feng's future course design will bring together game studies, world-making, and community-engaged learning #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    #watscon16 #d11 Low stakes writing, collaborative projects, plus emergent narratives = motivated students

    — Roger Graves (@rogergraves) October 21, 2016

    Through Feng's worldmaking, she encourages students to question the gatekeepers who manage knowledge #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    #watscon16 #d11 Feng: setting up a virtual world (via an overarching narrative plus periodic "cut scenes/videos"

    — Roger Graves (@rogergraves) October 21, 2016

    #WatsCon16 #d11 Feng: Need to aim for collaborative rather than competitive games (competitive games implement points, etc)

    — Roger Graves (@rogergraves) October 21, 2016

    #WatsCon16 #d11 shallow gamification (points, leaderboards) not tied to learning goals is problematic: need to tie in to student goals

    — Roger Graves (@rogergraves) October 21, 2016

    Gamification fails to capture the complexity of game play and offers shallow vs deep or structural vs content gamification #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    Feng points out the limitations of gamification in education, particularly the use of points, badges, and levels #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    Feng offers "play" as a form of subversion #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    Feng cites Gee's critique of individualized knowledge-production, positing world-making & gaming as an alternative pedagogy #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    "Just play" approach in the composition classroom demystifies some of the conventions of genre – @b_keegan #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    games demonstrate genre functions, including play within constraints, and prioaretic possibilities, says @b_keegan #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    in games, the act of invention often extends beyond the designer as players move through the game world @b_keegan #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    the specter of the rhetorical situation persists when viewing games from the perspective of the player – @b_keegan #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    https://twitter.com/DrCCedillo/status/789483831627833344

    @b_keegan opens his presentation and the panel on game studies with definitions of paida, ludus, and procedural rhetoric #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    excited a panel on game studies. Looking forward to a composition grounding games in the classroom #WatsCon16 #d11

    — Chase Bollig (@ChaseBollig) October 21, 2016

    Author

    • Kristin Ravel
      Kristin Ravel

      Dr. Kristin Ravel is an Assistant Professor of English at Rockford University. Her research interests encompass multimodality, digital media studies, ethics in communication, and feminist theory.

      View all posts
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    By Alyse CampbellMay 6, 20250

    Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 

    By Thais Rodrigues Cons, Toluwani OdedeyiApril 25, 20250

    Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia

    By Toluwani Odedeyi, Thais Rodrigues ConsMarch 31, 20250

    Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery

    By Mehdi MohammadiFebruary 11, 20250

    Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    By Marie Pruitt, Robert Beck, Alex MashnyFebruary 4, 20250

    Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.