Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    ATLAS.ti: Desktop and Cloud-based Coding Software

    0
    By Whitney Lew James, Angela Glotfelter on April 26, 2019 Hack & Yack, Hack

    ATLAS.ti offers various qualitative data analysis (QDA) solutions for researchers and students working with qualitative data. In this review, you’ll learn about how we have used two different ATLAS.ti products—ATLAS.ti desktop and ATLAS.ti Cloud (beta version)—a quick capabilities comparison of each, and their best uses for research and pedagogy.

    ATLAS.ti homepage
    ATLAS.ti Homepage

    How Whitney used ATLAS.ti Desktop

    I first learned about ATLAS.ti during my research methods course when we received an introduction and demo on the software from Dr. Ricardo Contreras, one of ATLAS.ti’s senior trainers and an anthropologist and ethnographer. I was immediately struck by the software’s ability to annotate traditional text documents as well as video, images, geo locations, and audio and to make connections within and across thousands of documents in a single project. The software also allows for and encourages documentation throughout the coding and analysis processes—capabilities very useful for large-scale projects as well as grounded theory and other inductive research methodologies.

    ATLAS.ti Desktop interface with documents and codes
    ATLAS.ti’s “code manager” view

    To get my feet wet and learn the software, I conducted a self-study of my responses to student writing for a CCCC presentation on translingual, antiracist writing practices. The ATLAS.ti interface and coding features were easy to use and helped me move quickly through the coding process. In fact, I spent significantly more time anonymizing and preparing the data than I did in the coding process. Although I was already working with data I produced, the ability to include descriptions for each code helped me stay accurate during the coding and begin articulating my commenting practices for the CCCC presentation. To analyze the data, I used the code comparison analysis feature. While ATLAS.ti clearly made this small qualitative analysis project smoother and more accurate, a raw comparison of code frequencies is only the tip of the iceberg for ATLAS.ti. I look forward to exploring more, particularly data visualizations, coding mixed media, and Twitter imports (see examples below).

    ATLAS.ti Twitter import feature
    ATLAS.ti Twitter data

    How Angela used ATLAS.ti Cloud (beta)

    I’ve used ATLAST.ti Cloud (beta) for both my own research as well as a tool for student projects. In this short video, I outline some of the basic functionalities of this web-based, qualitative coding software, giving you the information you need to quickly start up and begin using ATLAS.ti Cloud (beta).

    Capabilities Comparison

    *view details about 508 compliance

    Recommended Scholarly and Pedagogical Uses

    Use ATLAS.ti Desktop if you are

    • a scholar who wants to easily code data from a variety of media and make connections and generate theory across data
    • a teacher who wants to train graduate students in qualitative data analysis

    Use ATLAS.ti Cloud if you are

    • a scholar who wants to easily code primarily textual data
    • a teacher who wants to introduce graduate or undergraduate students to coding, organizing, analyzing, and generating insights from textual data

    Authors

    • Whitney Lew James
      Whitney Lew James

      Whitney Lew James is a PhD candidate in rhetoric and composition at Texas Christian University with research interests in translingual pedagogy, digital rhetoric, and disability studies.

      View all posts
    • Angela Glotfelter
      Angela Glotfelter

      Angela is a PhD student in Composition and Rhetoric at Miami University of Ohio, where she researches how content creators deal with the effects of algorithms on their work.

      View all posts
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    By Alyse CampbellMay 6, 20250

    Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 

    By Thais Rodrigues Cons, Toluwani OdedeyiApril 25, 20250

    Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia

    By Toluwani Odedeyi, Thais Rodrigues ConsMarch 31, 20250

    Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery

    By Mehdi MohammadiFebruary 11, 20250

    Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    By Marie Pruitt, Robert Beck, Alex MashnyFebruary 4, 20250

    Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.