Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    English Composition (Hussey, M.)

    0
    By Nupoor Ranade on June 29, 2021

    Name: Mark Hussey

    Download syllabus

    Date published: 2021

    Course level: First-Year

    Course title: English Composition

    Course description: This course emphasizes critical/logical thinking and reading, problem definition, research strategies, and writing analytical, evaluative, and/or argumentative compositions.

    Course philosophy/motivation: “We will reflect on the following question throughout the course: “How can the practice of rhetoric lead to personal growth and effective discourse?” This class focuses on the art and craft of rhetoric. Many people associate rhetoric with persuasion or manipulation, but I define it more broadly as the art of making meaning. In the context of an English course, the practice of this craft must go well beyond the traditional focus on grammar and on the “proper” way to compose specific types of essays. The “right” way to write is really just one interpretation of how to write well. I think there are many other, more diverse, and more effective ways of making meaning, of sharing that meaning with others, and of accomplishing our own purposes and goals through writing.

    We will dive into exploring, investigating, and elaborating on our course question by practicing the art of rhetoric, pushing ourselves to grow as persons and as effective writers. This class uses an active-learning approach to the class where, as Terry Doyle put it, “The one who does the work does the learning.” Additionally, this course is graded on a holistic evaluation of your skills as demonstrated in your written work by the end of the semester; I do not use points to measure learning. Thus, you are not penalized for taking risks or performing poorly at the beginning of the semester. Instead, your work is holistically assessed according to your proficiency with the following learning outcomes: 1) Creating effective discourse, 2) arguing convincingly, and 3) thinking critically. Through practice, an effective writing process, and feedback, this course will allow you to grow your skills in each of these areas. ”

    “Everything we do in this class connects back to our course statement: “In this class we will practice rhetoric to grow personally and to create effective discourse.” To accomplish that goal, we will practice, work at, and develop three learning outcomes: 1) Creating effective discourse, 2) arguing convincingly, and 3) thinking critically.”

    Cite as: Hussey, M, English Composition, July, 2021,  Gayle Morris Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative.

    Author

    • Nupoor Ranade
      Nupoor Ranade

      Nupoor is a PhD Candidate in the Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media at the North Carolina State University. Her research focuses on audience analysis, digital rhetoric, user experience and information design primarily in the field of technical communication and artificial intelligence. Her research experience and partnerships with the industry help her bridge gaps of knowledge that she then brings to her pedagogical practices.

      View all posts
    Syllabus Repository
    • Artificial Intelligence (6)
    • Research Methods (1)
    • Digital rhetoric (9)
    • Anti-racist pedagogy (3)
    • Feminist rhetoric (1)
    • Technical communication (5)
    • Composition studies (6)
    • First-year writing (8)
    • Gaming (1)
    • Writing for social media (2)
    • User experience (2)
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.