How can users be literate of systems that evade the comprehension of even the experts who created them? For generative A.I., such a literacy seems to depend upon terms of art: misleading homonyms like ‘explainable’, ‘memorization’, ‘natural’, etc. In the field of computer science, terms of art serve as metrics to quantitatively evaluate A.I. performance with the aim of achieving greater efficiency in the tasks those systems were programmed to perform in the first place. Apparently, machine intelligence has blasted off; it approaches infinity and beyond while we stand still. (DALL-E 2 output yielded from the input ‘birthday party’. Generated…
Recent Posts
- 2022-2023 Fellows End of Year Reflection
- Transformative Pedagogy and Decolonial Approach Through Digital Storytelling
- Dr. Jason Tham Interview
- Blog Carnival 21: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Rhetoric in the Age of Misinformation and AI Advancements”
- Scrivener: The Go-to APP for Writing
- Make It So: Assessing What Students Actually Think about Generative AI
- ChatGPT and Effective Pedagogy
- Through a ChatBot Darkly