“I have to question the validity of everything now,” read a student’s comment in the course evaluations for my recently concluded first-year writing seminar. Though the comment may have been offered as a complaint, the fact that it was provided in response to the questions “Did the course help you learn? Why or why not?” suggests a more positive valance. And as far as reported learning outcomes go, it’s one for which many professors would strive. Indeed, Trump’s win and the barrage of “fake news” and “alternative facts” that surround it have resulted in numerous calls for increased instruction of…
Recent Posts
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: EA.5 Navigating Algorithmic Literacy Practices among Digital Feminists and Activists in the Global South
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: CA.3 Developing AI Literacy in Composition Courses
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: D.6 Food Studies in Rhetoric and Writing: Taking Stock of Our Next Steps
- Starting with Voice: How Language Awareness Shapes Multimodal Composing
- From Studio Remixing to Classroom Remixing: How Research Posters Can Teach Semiotic Border-Crossing for Social Justice
- Multimodal, Multilingual Praxis in the First Year Composition Classroom: Reflections on Promoting Social and Linguistic Justice Via Rhetorical Translation
- Against Linguistic Flattening: Translingual Multimodality in the Age of AI
- When the Teacher Stops Talking: A Human-Centered Experiment with Classroom Silence