That the media distorts scientific findings is not a new observation. As this PhD Comic suggests, there is a long and rich history of the media sensationalizing small findings, giving them dire or miraculous consequences that never appeared in the initial study. However, the election makes such reporting seem not only unethical but downright dangerous. It is clear that the administration means to control science narratives by tactics such as removing all references to climate change from government websites. As we teach digital literacy in our classrooms, we often focus in on finding expert sources. But in terms of…
Recent Posts
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: EA.5 Navigating Algorithmic Literacy Practices among Digital Feminists and Activists in the Global South
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: CA.3 Developing AI Literacy in Composition Courses
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: D.6 Food Studies in Rhetoric and Writing: Taking Stock of Our Next Steps
- Starting with Voice: How Language Awareness Shapes Multimodal Composing
- From Studio Remixing to Classroom Remixing: How Research Posters Can Teach Semiotic Border-Crossing for Social Justice
- Multimodal, Multilingual Praxis in the First Year Composition Classroom: Reflections on Promoting Social and Linguistic Justice Via Rhetorical Translation
- Against Linguistic Flattening: Translingual Multimodality in the Age of AI
- When the Teacher Stops Talking: A Human-Centered Experiment with Classroom Silence