That the media distorts scientific findings is not a new observation. As this PhD Comic suggests, there is a long and rich history of the media sensationalizing small findings, giving them dire or miraculous consequences that never appeared in the initial study. However, the election makes such reporting seem not only unethical but downright dangerous. It is clear that the administration means to control science narratives by tactics such as removing all references to climate change from government websites. As we teach digital literacy in our classrooms, we often focus in on finding expert sources. But in terms of…
Recent Posts
- 2026-2027 DRC Fellows Application
- Expertise-in-the-loop: Genre Judgment, Context, and AI in Writing
- Liminality-in-the-Loop Writing: Relational Meaning-Making in Human–Machine Composing
- Intro to Blog Carnival 25: [Blank]-in-the-loop writing
- Call for Session Reviews: Computers and Writing Conference 2026
- Social Justice Pedagogies
- Blog Carnival 24: Editor’s Outro: Multimodality, Social Justice, and Human-Centered Praxis
- From Digital Content to Academic Confidence: My Rhetorical Journey