In my research methods course, students are allowed—encouraged—to use generative AI in their project work, while also retaining the option to refuse it. There is one condition: they must document how they use it. Every prompt, revision, discarded output, refusal, and moment of uncertainty goes into a semester-long reflective blog. I designed the course this way because I wanted students to slow down and critically engage with AI-generated outputs rather than treating them as neutral or immediately usable. Instead of simply accepting outputs, students revise prompts, compare iterations, verify claims, rewrite sections in their own voices, and examine the rhetorical…
Recent Posts
- Duck-(and Human)-in-the-Loop Writing: Musings from a Professor and a Group of Writing Fellows
- A Colleague in the Loop: Writing the Classroom Together
- Care-in-the-Loop Writing
- From Ghostwriter to Co-Author-in-the-Loop: Making AI’s Writing Labor Visible
- 2026-2027 DRC Fellows Application
- Expertise-in-the-loop: Genre Judgment, Context, and AI in Writing
- Liminality-in-the-Loop Writing: Relational Meaning-Making in Human–Machine Composing
- Intro to Blog Carnival 25: [Blank]-in-the-loop writing