Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    Myths of Multimodal Composing

    0
    By Amy Braziller, Elizabeth Kleinfeld on September 3, 2015 Hack & Yack, Yack

    We’re thrilled to announce our latest Hack and Yack Series. Over the next four weeks, Amy Braziller and Elizabeth Kleinfeld, authors of The Bedford Book of Genres, will be sharing with us an extended look at multimodal composition. Whether you’ve been teaching multimodal composing for a while or you’re not sure where to begin, be sure to tune in Thursdays in September. Amy and Elizabeth have something for everyone. They will share the myths of multimodal composition, considerations for “going multimodal,” anecdotes from their own classrooms, and lots of strategies to help us all become more mindful of our writing pedagogy.

    Welcome, Amy and Elizabeth!

    ***

    So you want to multimodal. You’re psyched, excited about a new approach and already anticipating the cool projects your students will create. But as you start sketching out a syllabus and assignments, you stop. Stymied. Worried. The voices of colleagues and other naysayers reciting the reasons to not go multimodal echo in your head. You wonder what is reality, what is myth.

    Five Myths (and their realities)

    Students won’t write enough
    Oftentimes, people believe that when students compose podcasts, photo essays, billboRachel writer statementards, digital stories, and other genre pieces that are not primarily text, they don’t get the writing experience that a composition class should deliver. There’s worry that students are not doing the work of a writing class. This is simply not true; our students write constantly. Every composition our students create is accompanied by an argumentative/reflective essay articulating the choices made in the composing process and arguing that they are appropriate for the rhetorical situation. Sometimes, prior to beginning the composition, students might submit a written proposal, discussing their ideas and providing justification for their approach. In reality, our students may actually write more than a traditional approach would ask them to.

    Students won’t learn what they need to be successful in their other writing classes
    We’ve heard people call a multimodal composition class an “arts and crafts” class and question how creating a podcast or advertising campaign could help students with writing the typical college essay or research paper. The benefit of a multimodal approach is that students learn to angwenalyze complex rhetorical situations, and every college writing assignment presents a rhetorical situation to be analyzed and responded to. A key learning outcome for most composition classes is to write within a rhetorical situation. With a multimodal approach, students have to think much more carefully about their purpose, audience, and chosen rhetorical appeals and then consider which genres and modes of composition match this rhetorical situation best. Many types of composition might fit the situation, so a student learns to become flexible and critical, examining the situation and making choices. They might try something and discover that choice doesn’t help them achieve their purpose. They start over. They revise. They reflect. They repurpose.

    You have to be an expert in so many genres/modes
    graphicmemoirsampleMagazine articles. Brochures. Digital stories. Podcasts. Graphic memoirs. The list of genres students compose in can be endless. You’re not skilled in graphics; you’re only able to draw stick figures to illustrate a graphic memoir. It doesn’t matter. Concentrate on teaching students how to recognize
    and analyze the conventions of a particular genre. They can then apply these analytical skills to the genre piece they’ve chosen to create. They’ll show you the app on their phone for recording a podcast. They’ll show you the web page for creating an infographic. They’ll show you the latest fanzine for their favorite local band and explain to you how it differs from a booklet. Students become experts and teach you. Your job isn’t to be the expert on every genre, but rather to teach students how to become an expert on the genre in which they want to compose.

    You have to be a technowiz
    dawson
    Multimodality does not necessarily mean high tech. Sure, lots of multimodal compositions might incorporate flashy visuals and intricate audio. But that’s not necessary. A billboard can be created on a computer. Or a billboard can be created using markers, scissors, glue, and cardboard. Students can create low-tech projects. Some of the most powerful projects our students have created did not involve technology, such as the giant paper-mache pill capsule that opened up to reveal other project components and the portable backyard (a Radio Flyer wagon filled with dirt, soil, grass, and a plant).

    Students will embrace multimodal composing
    They are purveyors of the visual. The audio. It’s native to their generation. They have grown up watching YouTube, listening to sound bytes, doing all of their communication on a phone. But this doesn’t mean that they have done a lot of composing. Sometimes they initially resist the idea of creating multimodal compositions, preferring the familiar, the text, the essay. They believe that’s easier because they are already familiar with it. The reality is that you will have to sell your students on the value of a composition class whether you take a multimodal approach or a traditional approach.

    With these five myths banished from your mind, you can charge ahead and plan your multimodal composition class.

    Check back next Thursday for tips on crafting multimodal assignments to develop 21st century literacies.

     

    Authors

    • Amy Braziller
      Amy Braziller

      Amy Braziller is a Professor of English at Red Rocks Community College. Amy has presented on teaching writing and new media at numerous national and regional conferences. Her research focuses on the intersections between classroom and personal writing. She is co-author (with Elizabeth Kleinfeld) of The Bedford Book of Genres.

      View all posts
    • Elizabeth Kleinfeld
      Elizabeth Kleinfeld

      I teach rhetoric and writing theory and practice courses in the English department and direct the Writing Center at Metropolitan State University of Denver. Before joining the MSU Denver faculty in 2008, I taught at Red Rocks Community College for thirteen years. You can learn more about me here: http://elizabethkleinfeld.com/.

      View all posts
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    By Alyse CampbellMay 6, 20250

    Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 

    By Thais Rodrigues Cons, Toluwani OdedeyiApril 25, 20250

    Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia

    By Toluwani Odedeyi, Thais Rodrigues ConsMarch 31, 20250

    Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery

    By Mehdi MohammadiFebruary 11, 20250

    Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    By Marie Pruitt, Robert Beck, Alex MashnyFebruary 4, 20250

    Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.