Digital rhetorics1 provide a vast suite of generating principles. These principles are difficult to collect into a simple model, much less to name, substantiate, and prioritize. Fortunately, difficulties like these are much of what motivates digital rhetorics scholarship (some of which was reviewed by others in previous entries), and they are also what I find both exciting and challenging about the field. Digital rhetorics often draw on reasonably well-traveled rhetorical theories (Aristotle’s appeals, Burke’s dramatisms, stases, etc.), but they also subject traditional concepts to renewal and reinvention. Collin Brooke’s Lingua Fracta comes to mind as a terrific example of this…
Recent Posts
- Operational-Infrastructure-in-the-Loop
- Surveillance-in-the-loop writing
- Refusal-in-the-loop writing—or, what happened to the field that stood up to TurnItIn, Course Hero, Chegg, and paper mills?
- Productive Friction: Breakdown, Resistance, and Power In-the-Loop Writing
- Duck-(and Human)-in-the-Loop Writing: Musings from a Professor and a Group of Writing Fellows
- A Colleague in the Loop: Writing the Classroom Together
- Care-in-the-Loop Writing
- From Ghostwriter to Co-Author-in-the-Loop: Making AI’s Writing Labor Visible