Digital rhetorics1 provide a vast suite of generating principles. These principles are difficult to collect into a simple model, much less to name, substantiate, and prioritize. Fortunately, difficulties like these are much of what motivates digital rhetorics scholarship (some of which was reviewed by others in previous entries), and they are also what I find both exciting and challenging about the field. Digital rhetorics often draw on reasonably well-traveled rhetorical theories (Aristotle’s appeals, Burke’s dramatisms, stases, etc.), but they also subject traditional concepts to renewal and reinvention. Collin Brooke’s Lingua Fracta comes to mind as a terrific example of this…
Recent Posts
- 2026-2027 DRC Fellows Application
- Expertise-in-the-loop: Genre Judgment, Context, and AI in Writing
- Liminality-in-the-Loop Writing: Relational Meaning-Making in Human–Machine Composing
- Intro to Blog Carnival 25: [Blank]-in-the-loop writing
- Call for Session Reviews: Computers and Writing Conference 2026
- Social Justice Pedagogies
- Blog Carnival 24: Editor’s Outro: Multimodality, Social Justice, and Human-Centered Praxis
- From Digital Content to Academic Confidence: My Rhetorical Journey