In the age of generative AI, writing classrooms and online platforms are facing a subtle but powerful phenomenon: linguistic flattening. I have been noticing it more and more. The way writers, consciously or unconsciously, start to lean on the same phrases, sentence structures, and tonal conventions is concerning. Undergraduate students, especially those for whom English is an additional language, are particularly vulnerable. AI offers quick fixes to grammar correction, stylistic polish, surface-level coherence, but it cannot replace the kind of cognitive work that essentially develops writing skills. As Lynda Gratton (2024) points out, AI may accelerate learning, but it cannot…
Recent Posts
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: EA.5 Navigating Algorithmic Literacy Practices among Digital Feminists and Activists in the Global South
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: CA.3 Developing AI Literacy in Composition Courses
- CCCC 2026 Session Review: D.6 Food Studies in Rhetoric and Writing: Taking Stock of Our Next Steps
- Starting with Voice: How Language Awareness Shapes Multimodal Composing
- From Studio Remixing to Classroom Remixing: How Research Posters Can Teach Semiotic Border-Crossing for Social Justice
- Multimodal, Multilingual Praxis in the First Year Composition Classroom: Reflections on Promoting Social and Linguistic Justice Via Rhetorical Translation
- Against Linguistic Flattening: Translingual Multimodality in the Age of AI
- When the Teacher Stops Talking: A Human-Centered Experiment with Classroom Silence