Although they are excellent learning tools, collaborative writing projects can also become inequitable as students with different commitments, priorities, accessibility needs, and financial limitations struggle to balance the workload and support each other. Part of the problem is that student groups tend to split-up and create different pieces of the final product in isolation, stitch those pieces together, and present the whole to the instructor. While this may be efficient, it often results in disjointed Frankenprojects and at least one group member engaging in “free-riding behavior” (St. John et al.). This is not the kind of collaboration I hope for…
Recent Posts
- Scooby Doo, Who Are You?: Scaffolding Collaboration Through Narrative Tropes
- On Creative Permission: Offering Multimodal Choice in First-Year Writing
- Multimodal Reading as Valid Academic Practice
- Centering Lived Experiences in Multimodal Writing and Digital Literacy Pedagogy
- Design as Praxis: Multimodal Composition in Writing Center Administration
- Multimodal Approaches to Faculty Development Spaces
- Teaching Access: Multimodal Pedagogy as Social Justice in Technical Communication
- Sonic Digital Humanities as Human-Centered Praxis