Although they are excellent learning tools, collaborative writing projects can also become inequitable as students with different commitments, priorities, accessibility needs, and financial limitations struggle to balance the workload and support each other. Part of the problem is that student groups tend to split-up and create different pieces of the final product in isolation, stitch those pieces together, and present the whole to the instructor. While this may be efficient, it often results in disjointed Frankenprojects and at least one group member engaging in “free-riding behavior” (St. John et al.). This is not the kind of collaboration I hope for…
Recent Posts
- [Utopia]-in-the-loop in an Emergent Age of Full Automation
- Ghosts-in-the-Loop: Bormann’s Ghost v. AI
- Relational-in-the-Loop Writing: Reframing Rhetorical Load Sharing as a Rhetorical Assemblage
- Accessibility-in-the-Loop: Rhetorics of Resistance, Freedom, and Care
- Operational-Infrastructure-in-the-Loop
- Surveillance-in-the-Loop Writing
- Refusal-in-the-Loop Writing—or, what happened to the field that stood up to TurnItIn, Course Hero, Chegg, and paper mills?
- Productive Friction: Breakdown, Resistance, and Power In-the-Loop Writing