Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Blog Carnival 24: Editor’s Outro: Multimodality, Social Justice, and Human-Centered Praxis
    • From Digital Content to Academic Confidence: My Rhetorical Journey
    • Scooby Doo, Who Are You?: Scaffolding Collaboration Through Narrative Tropes
    • On Creative Permission: Offering Multimodal Choice in First-Year Writing
    • Multimodal Reading as Valid Academic Practice
    • Centering Lived Experiences in Multimodal Writing and Digital Literacy Pedagogy
    • Design as Praxis: Multimodal Composition in Writing Center Administration
    • Multimodal Approaches to Faculty Development Spaces
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2026 CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2025 C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • On Visual Rhetoric
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
      • DRC Fellows Application
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    WRA 441 Social Justice as Rhetorical Practice: Prison Writing

    0
    By Kirk A. Astle, Nicole K. Golden on May 15, 2026

    Date Published: 2026

    Syllabus WRA 441 – Kirk AstleDownload Course Syllabus

    Course Context

    The Social Justice as Rhetorical Practice (WRA 441) course is an upper-division elective offering from a Midwest Research 1 university. Emphasizing rhetorical analysis of public and professional writing, the course is open to graduate and undergraduate students in a 15-week semester, face-to-face format.

    Reflection

    This was the first time I taught this course with a diverse student population from various disciplines and at different levels of matriculation. The rhetoric of prison writing produced from multiple positions framed the course; however, prison writing as such addresses and advances social justice principles. Through our rhetorical analyses students discovered tropes of prison writing, such as testimonial realism and spiritual or transformative journeys. Students also reflected on academic discourses of the humanities’ and social sciences’ key moves such as reflexivity, ethical awareness, and dialogic orientation. The in-class writings offer students rhetorical experiments using course readings so they can work hands-on with constructing different effects on the way toward making social justice inflected appeals and arguments. I use a Grading Contract as a way to highlight how social justice can/ought to be advanced in a learning environment. Yet, the contract is also limited as a neo-liberal as a political-economic construct. I learned it is challenging to have students focus on rhetoric while bracketing vehemence over the injustices of social systems particularly the criminal legal system, which is precisely one of the course’s key goals: to understand the animating grounds for rhetorical constructions which are always already socio-political acts. In our discussions it became clear we needed to address early on how rights-, interest-, and needs-based discourses also framed rhetorical choices. In the future, I would flip this course on its head so that students chose their individual entry points into prison writing’s relationship to social justice and then, following their leads and interests, assist them with advancing their rhetorical analyses of texts related to U.S. mass incarceration. 

    Authors

    • Kirk A. Astle

      Kirk Astle analyzes power formations through literary analyses of fictional representations as well as rhetorical analyses of non-fictional and professional texts. He has taught at colleges and universities across Michigan, including Prison Education Programs inside three Michigan prisons.

      View all posts
    • Nicole K. Golden

      Nicole Koyuki Golden (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Rhetoric, Writing, and Cultures at Michigan State University. Her research interests include technical communication, digital and cultural rhetorics, and Asian/American communities.

      View all posts
    Syllabus Repository
    • Carceral Rhetoric (2)
    • Social Justice Pedagogies (3)
    • Writing with Data (8)
    • Research Methods (2)
    • Artificial Intelligence (6)
    • Digital rhetoric (9)
    • Anti-racist pedagogy (3)
    • Feminist rhetoric (1)
    • Technical communication (6)
    • Composition studies (6)
    • First-year writing (8)
    • Gaming (1)
    • Writing for social media (2)
    • User experience (2)
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.