Defending the Digital There is a noticeable dystopic strand in digital rhetoric scholarship – a sense that we have a responsibility to extend rhetorical analysis into the digital because we need to find out what’s really happening, to discover how our world is being undermined or overtaken. This is even more pronounced in popular media, where headlines such as “Don’t Believe the Algorithm” and “If an Algorithm Wrote This, How Would You Even Know?” stoke popular fears about robot overlords emerging from parthenogenetic, mysteriously mathematical creation cycles. Rhetorical scholarship rarely becomes so fearmongering, but it also tends to take on…
Recent Posts
- Blog Carnival 24: Editor’s Outro: Multimodality, Social Justice, and Human-Centered Praxis
- From Digital Content to Academic Confidence: My Rhetorical Journey
- Scooby Doo, Who Are You?: Scaffolding Collaboration Through Narrative Tropes
- On Creative Permission: Offering Multimodal Choice in First-Year Writing
- Multimodal Reading as Valid Academic Practice
- Centering Lived Experiences in Multimodal Writing and Digital Literacy Pedagogy
- Design as Praxis: Multimodal Composition in Writing Center Administration
- Multimodal Approaches to Faculty Development Spaces