Since the public release of generative AI tools in late 2022, writing studies has been filled with debate, uncertainty, and rapid institutional response. Early conversations circulate familiar narratives of technological crisis and anxious headlines and hot takes lamenting that AI “Destroys College Writing?” (Hsu, 2025), “signals death of author” (Lachman, 2025), and might “kill writing career” (Benitez, 2025), largely because AI appeared capable of generating complete texts and appeared to perform writing. At the same time, other scholars and teachers continue to call for refusal, boundary-setting, and renewed attention to humanistic values in writing instruction (Fernandes et al., 2024; Brown…
Recent Posts
- [Utopia]-in-the-loop in an Emergent Age of Full Automation
- Ghosts-in-the-Loop: Bormann’s Ghost v. AI
- Relational-in-the-Loop Writing: Reframing Rhetorical Load Sharing as a Rhetorical Assemblage
- Accessibility-in-the-Loop: Rhetorics of Resistance, Freedom, and Care
- Operational-Infrastructure-in-the-Loop
- Surveillance-in-the-Loop Writing
- Refusal-in-the-Loop Writing—or, what happened to the field that stood up to TurnItIn, Course Hero, Chegg, and paper mills?
- Productive Friction: Breakdown, Resistance, and Power In-the-Loop Writing