Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • C&W 2025 Session Review: “Whose Time is It, Anyway?” (Keynote)
    • 2025 C&W Session Review: From Chatbot to Classroom: Understanding Student and Instructor Use and Perceptions of AI (Session C)
    • 2025 C&W Session Review: “Invention, AI, and Circulation” (Session F)
    • 2025 C&W Session Review: “Moving through Space” (Session H)
    • Blog Carnival 23: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Collage as Socialist Circulation
    • Play, Rhetoric, and the Circulation of J.D. Vance Photoshops
    • Attending to Scales of Intensity: A Viral/Chronological Method for Researching the Circulation of Activist Rhetoric
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2025 C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
      • DRC Fellows Application
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    Watson Keynote Session 7: Eli Goldblatt, “Imagine a Schoolyard: Mobilizing Urban Literacy Sponsorship Networks”

    0
    By Kathryn Perry on November 10, 2016 2016 Watson Reviews

    Presenter
    Eli Goldblatt

    Review
    In his Watson Conference keynote paper, Eli Goldblatt narrates the development of an ongoing partnership of literacy sponsors (including higher education, local nonprofits, city services, and a public school) in order to turn an abandoned block near a struggling (but improving) elementary school into an educational community space/urban garden. He discusses the mobility work of this network of literacy sponsors in their efforts to support the literacy of a disadvantaged urban population of students in northern Philadelphia, describing mobility as both a sign of health and of distress depending on the populations and their motivations for moving/mobilizing.

    img_4283

    In this final keynote session, Eli Goldblatt offered up several ways for conference-goers to think about our roles in the complex relationship between race and literacy. Following typical Watson Conference procedure, rather than describing his keynote paper (which had been workshopped in the Watson Symposium in February 2016, and the final version of which all conference-goers had the chance to read prior to the conference), Goldblatt read what he called a “professional love letter” to Carmen Kynard in response to her rich feedback on his earlier draft at the Symposium. Addressing Kynard’s concerns about the absence of race in Goldblatt’s analysis of local networks of literacy sponsorship surrounding an urban educational multi-use community space, Goldblatt openly and honestly began his talk with questions he had recently received from the interim director of Tree House, the nonprofit literacy organization with which he has worked for several years. This new director, a white woman, asked him how race plays into literacy at Tree House. Goldblatt offered the question up to us: what do we as a field have to say to her? How does race form the context for literacy learning in America? He continued on to say that both the “fiction of race” and the “palpable reality of racism” can (and are) easily ignored by the dominant culture, which tends not to recognize the suffering of others. Drawing on his own personal stake in the violence of racism, Goldblatt told us of his son, a large multi-racial man who he could imagine pulled over and hurt by police. He reminded us that literacy is always local, which means that Tree House must ask: how does a white person act responsibly in a literacy institution sponsoring African-American learners? He told us that “people learn reading and writing within the fabric of their intimate and ongoing lives,” and pointed out how hard it is “to put local literacy into practice if you don’t feel it in your pedagogical bones and renew your commitment to social progress every day.”

    Following Goldblatt’s speech, moderator Anis Bawarshi asked the audience members to write and reflect for 5 minutes, after which the floor was opened up to questions. The following conversation included a range of questions and comments, such as: What can mobility studies do to make visible the effects of racism? How do we stay in dialogue with people like the interim director of Tree House, but not lose African Americans as our audience; indeed, how do we recognize that they are an audience with authority who needs to be conceptualized in our dialogues? How do we create more opportunities to honestly and safely discuss issues of race and racism that are relevant to our campus communities? Perhaps we need to look at the laws that are supposed to protect us from racism, and perhaps mobility means looking back at the historical context of laws meant to protect lives.

    The panel ended with some final thoughts from Goldblatt on the unintended segregation that our fields of expertise tend to promote (segregation based on our own specialized knowledge) and the subsequent need to seek out interdisciplinary connections surrounding larger issues such as race.

    Author

    • Kathryn Perry
      Kathryn Perry

      Kathryn is an Assistant Professor of English at California State University, Los Angeles. Her research explores the role of narrative in shaping community literacy practices and community engagement partnerships.

      View all posts
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    By Alyse CampbellJune 24, 20250

    C&W 2025 Session Review: “Whose Time is It, Anyway?” (Keynote)

    By Precious AmaefuleJune 22, 20250

    2025 C&W Session Review: From Chatbot to Classroom: Understanding Student and Instructor Use and Perceptions of AI (Session C)

    By Bri LafondJune 22, 20250

    2025 C&W Session Review: “Invention, AI, and Circulation” (Session F)

    By Bri LafondJune 22, 20250

    2025 C&W Session Review: “Moving through Space” (Session H)

    By Marie Pruitt, Alex Mashny and Robert BeckJune 16, 20250

    Blog Carnival 23: Editor’s Outro: “Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies

    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.