If we want to understand the various forms of writing “in-the-loop,” then we must start with understanding the loops themselves. While discussions of accessibility, expertise, collaboration and more are at the forefront of the conversations here, if one wants to understand the impact that these topics have on their own loops, we must understand what a loop is in the first place, how it comes to be, and, most interestingly, how it might be changed if we find ourselves dissatisfied with the loops we participate in. Loops can be understood further as infrastructural rhetorical objects, specifically operational rhetorical objects. Studying…
Recent Posts
- The Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative Interviews the editors of Computers and Composition
- [Utopia]-in-the-loop in an Emergent Age of Full Automation
- Ghosts-in-the-Loop: Bormann’s Ghost v. AI
- Relational-in-the-Loop Writing: Reframing Rhetorical Load Sharing as a Rhetorical Assemblage
- Accessibility-in-the-Loop: Rhetorics of Resistance, Freedom, and Care
- Operational-Infrastructure-in-the-Loop
- Surveillance-in-the-Loop Writing
- Refusal-in-the-Loop Writing—or, what happened to the field that stood up to TurnItIn, Course Hero, Chegg, and paper mills?