Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    Course Activity: “‘Mow the Lawn’ Visual Rhetorical Analysis”

    0
    By Jennifer Burke Reifman on August 10, 2022

    Assignment Title: “‘Mow the Lawn’ Visual Rhetorical Analysis”

    Authors: Mary F. McGinnis, Ph.D., College of Coastal Georgia (mmcginnis@ccga.edu)

    Date published: August, 2022

    Download Activity 

    Class Info/Tags: Digital Rhetoric, Feminist Rhetoric, Face-to-Face

    Course Motivation: By the end of the course students should be able to:

    • Recognize writing as a process, including planning, drafting, peer reviewing, revising, and reflecting.
    • Exercise rhetorical awareness while reading, analyzing, and composing.
    • Engage critical thinking skills through essays, multimodal assignments, class presentations, group projects, and/or discussions.
    • Demonstrate rudimentary research skills, identify, summarize, and integrate information from outside sources into compositions of various genres; avoid plagiarism.
    • Practice citing and documenting outside sources in their compositions.
    • Identify appropriate mechanical and grammatical usage for specific audiences and genres.

    Context of Use: I use this assignment to demonstrate how to complete a visual analysis on a piece of visual media. The students will complete their own visual media analysis at the end of the sequence. This demonstration is one of the first steps.

    Instructor Reflection: I like this activity because students find the subject matter of the commercial funny, and they get really engaged with the ideas being taught by the commercial. Prior to this part of the assignment sequence, students have read Jean Kilbourne’s “Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt” and have watched Killing Us Softly 4. These two pieces help students understand how cultural codes in advertising and other visual media operate. It is sometimes a little difficult for students to recognize the racist stereotypes in the commercial because they’re often focused on Kilbourne’s analysis of the images of women, or students sometimes don’t know how to articulate what they’re seeing.

    Author

    • Jennifer Burke Reifman
      Jennifer Burke Reifman

      Jennifer Burke Reifman is a 5th year Education Ph.D. Candidate at U.C. Davis with an emphasis in Writing, Rhetoric, and Composition Studies. Her research focuses on technology in the writing classroom, writing program administration, and student identity and agency. When she isn't being a graduate student and writing teacher, she spends most of her time playing with her 3-year old son, tending her backyard garden, or diving into a video game.

      View all posts
    Course Activities
    • All Course Activities (12)
      • Anti-Racist Pedagogies (2)
      • Composition Studies (4)
      • Digital Rhetoric (7)
      • Feminist Rhetoric (1)
      • Multimodal Rhetorics (5)
      • Technical Communication (3)
      • Writing for Social Media (4)
      • Face-to-Face (9)
      • Hybrid (3)
      • Synchronous (3)
      • Asynchronous (1)
    Prompts
    • All Prompts (10)
      • Anti-Racist Pedagogies (1)
      • Composition Studies (7)
      • Digital Rhetoric (2)
      • Multimodal Rhetorics (3)
      • Writing for Social Media (2)
      • First-Year Course (5)
      • Upper Level Course (3)
      • In-Person Class (1)
      • Face-to-Face (8)
      • Hybrid Course (4)
      • Synchronous (5)
      • Asynchronous (1)
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.