Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Recent Posts
    • Attending Computers and Writing 2025? Be a Session Reviewer! 
    • Charisse Iglesias: Community Engagement Beyond Academia
    • Addison Kliewer – Bridging Academia and Industry with Technical Writing Mastery
    • Philosophy of Technology in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Call for Blog Carnival 23: Digital Circulation in Rhetoric and Writing Studies
    • Introduction to Robert Beck
    • Introduction to Alex Mashny
    • Introduction to Marie Pruitt
    RSS Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative
    • Home
    • Conversations
      • Blog Carnivals
      • DRC Talk Series
      • Hack & Yack
      • DRC Wiki
    • Reviews
      • CCCC Reviews
        • 2023 CCCC Reviews
        • 2022 CCCC Reviews
        • 2021 CCCC Reviews
        • 2019 CCCC Reviews
      • C&W Reviews
        • 2022 C&W Reviews
        • 2019 C&W Reviews
        • 2018 C&W Reviews
        • 2017 C&W Reviews
        • 2016 C&W Reviews
        • 2015 C&W Reviews
        • 2014 C&W Reviews
        • 2013 C&W Reviews
        • 2012 C&W Reviews
      • MLA Reviews
        • 2019 MLA Reviews
        • 2014 MLA Reviews
        • 2013 MLA Reviews
      • Other Reviews
        • 2018 Watson Reviews
        • 2017 Feminisms & Rhetorics
        • 2017 GPACW
        • 2016 Watson Reviews
        • 2015 IDRS Reviews
      • Webtext of the Month
    • Teaching Materials
      • Syllabus Repository
      • Teaching & Learning Materials (TLM) Collection
    • Books
      • Memetic Rhetorics
      • Beyond the Makerspace
      • Video Scholarship and Screen Composing
      • 100 Years of New Media Pedagogy
      • Writing Workflows
      • Rhetorical Code Studies
      • Developing Writers in Higher Education
      • Sites of Translation
      • Rhizcomics
      • Making Space
      • Digital Samaritans
      • DRC Book Prize
      • Submit a Book Proposal
    • DRC Fellow Projects
    • About
      • Advisory Board
      • Graduate Fellows
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative

    Writing Prompt: “Personal Learning Projects”

    0
    By Sarah Hughes on August 10, 2022

    Assignment Title: Personal Learning Projects

    Author: Olivia Imirie, Salisbury University (onimirie@salisbury.edu)

    Date published: August, 2022

    Download Personal Learning Project Prompt

    Download Peer Review Prompt

    Class Info/Tags: First-Year Composition, Face-to-Face, Hybrid, Synchronous, Composition Studies

    Course Motivation: The goal of this course is to expand students’ views of how writing works, and their understanding of their own beliefs and practices as a writer.

    Context of Use: This assignment is the final project in this course, and the purpose is for students to reflect on what they have learned about themselves as a writer and create an evidence-based argument about what they have learned. To do this, students create a multi-modal project using visuals as their evidence to demonstrate their most significant learning.

    Instructor Reflection: In this project, I enjoy seeing students engage deeper in explaining their own learning than a mere reflection. In traditional reflective assignments, students’ statements about what they have learned are often vague or shallow reflections rather than concrete evidence to support their claims about their learning. By using visuals, students must provide specific examples to illustrate the learning they have experienced in the course. Particularly, students use visual examples from their own writing (typically captured through screenshots or pictures) to show rather than tell what they have learned. As a result, their explanations of their learning (via a written transcript or Zoom recording) are much more specific and concrete. I find the biggest challenge in teaching students this project is that they often quickly become overwhelmed with all the expectations in the prompt. This project has a lot of parts that can feel confusing to many students. This is why I created an example Power Point and transcript that I show in class after discussing the prompt. I use these examples to show an example visual and how the words in the transcript unpack the significance of this visual. After reviewing this example, students are much more comfortable with this project. I also use peer review guidelines to help students understand the expectations of the assignment. The guidelines use a combination of a checklist and short answer questions, so students can ensure that they are meeting the learning goals of the assignment and not missing any expectations.

    Author

    • Sarah Hughes
      Sarah Hughes

      Sarah Hughes is a PhD candidate in the Joint Program in English & Education at the University of Michigan, where she also teaches in the English Department Writing Program. Her research interests include digital rhetoric, gender and discourse, and gaming studies. Her dissertation project explores how women use multimodal discourse—grammatically, narratively, and visually—to navigate online gaming ecologies.

      View all posts
    Course Activities
    • All Course Activities (12)
      • Anti-Racist Pedagogies (2)
      • Composition Studies (4)
      • Digital Rhetoric (7)
      • Feminist Rhetoric (1)
      • Multimodal Rhetorics (5)
      • Technical Communication (3)
      • Writing for Social Media (4)
      • Face-to-Face (9)
      • Hybrid (3)
      • Synchronous (3)
      • Asynchronous (1)
    Prompts
    • All Prompts (10)
      • Anti-Racist Pedagogies (1)
      • Composition Studies (7)
      • Digital Rhetoric (2)
      • Multimodal Rhetorics (3)
      • Writing for Social Media (2)
      • First-Year Course (5)
      • Upper Level Course (3)
      • In-Person Class (1)
      • Face-to-Face (8)
      • Hybrid Course (4)
      • Synchronous (5)
      • Asynchronous (1)
    Digital Rhetoric Collaborative | Gayle Morris Sweetland Center for Writing | University of Michigan

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.